Skip to main content

Senate Cloture on Shutdown Package

The Senate has made progress towards ending the government shutdown. The Senate, by a vote of 60 to 40, invoked cloture on consideration of the House-passed Continuing Resolution after an agreement was reached yesterday with eight Senate Democrats on replacement language, which the Senate will vote on next.

On our specific issues, the language would do the following:
1. Extend the temporary Medicare ambulance add-ons payments through January 30, 2026
2. Prevent PAYGO cuts to Medicare providers and suppliers from H.R. 1
3. Extend Medicare sequestration provider cuts for another month

We will keep you posted on new developments.

Senators Collins and Welch Have Introduced TIP Senate Companion Legislation

Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Peter Welch (D-VT) introduced the Senate version of the CARE Act (S. 3145) to establish a CMMI demonstration program for reimbursement of ambulance responses with medical care provided on-site without transport to a medical facility. Linked below is a copy of the press release from Senator Collins, as well as both the House and Senate versions of the bill.

Sen. Collins Press Release

Senate Bill Text

House Bill Text 

 

Contact your member of Congress today!

With the Medicare ambulance add-ons having expired at least temporarily, it is critical that you contact your Members of Congress now to ask for their support in reinstating and making permanent this vital financial relief. They can demonstrate their support by cosponsoring the Protecting Access to Ground Ambulance Medical Services Act (H.R. 2232, S. 1643). Please customize the sample template letter to let them know of the financial impact of the loss of the additional 2% urban, 3% rural and 22.6% super rural in additional Medicare payments on your operation.

Click the link below and write your members of Congress today about reinstating and extending the add-on payments.

Contact your members of Congress here!

AAA Nominates Mike Thomas to Serve Again on NEMSAC

American Ambulance Association President Jamie Pafford-Gresham has nominated AAA Board Member Mike Thomas of JanCare Ambulance in West Virginia to once again serve as the “private (career non-fire) EMS” representative on the National Emergency Medical Services Advisory Committee (NEMSAC). The Administration recently ended the terms of previous federal advisory committee members, including those on NEMSAC, and is now accepting new nominations. Mike previously served on NEMSAC, and the AAA is proud to renominate him for a full term in his role representing private EMS.

Congressional Letter on Updating Medicare Zip Codes

On September 18, Congresswoman Carol Miller (R-WV) was joined by 13 members of Congress in a letter to CMS requesting that the agency update the zip code designations under the Medicare ambulance fee schedule based on the 2020 census.

According to an analysis by AAA data firm of Health Management Associates, the update would result in a net of 1,490 zip codes being redesigned as super rural instead of rural and 782 zip codes being rural instead of urban. Ground ambulance service organizations that serve these rural and super rural areas would thus benefit from the additional reimbursement for rural and super rural areas.

CMS is overdue in automatically updating the zip codes based on the 2020 census data.
.

Impact of Potential Federal Government Shutdown on Medicare Payments

Impact of Potential Federal Government Shutdown on Medicare Payments, Including  the Temporary Aad-ons for Ground Ambulance Services

 

The federal government is funded through annual appropriations enacted by Congress.  Funding for the federal government’s current fiscal year is currently set to expire today, September 30, 2025.  If Congress fails to pass a spending package for the full year – – or a temporary funding package for a shorter period (known as a “continuing resolution”) – – many federal agencies will have to curtail their activities.  On September 18, 2025, the House of Representatives passed a continuing resolution that would have funded the federal government through November 21, 2025; however, that bill failed to pass the Senate.  As a result, barring a last-minute deal, a federal government shutdown will commence on October 1, 2025.

A government shutdown is not expected to impact Medicare payments to health care providers, i.e., Medicare Administrative Contractors will continue to process and pay Medicare claims.  However, past government shutdowns have impacted other Medicare operations, including provider enrollment and pre- and post-payment audit activities.  Providers that are currently in the process of enrolling and/or revalidating their Medicare enrollment may experience delays in the processing of these applications.

As a reminder, existing law requires that Medicare Administrative Contractors hold claims for a minimum of fourteen (14) days.  This “payment floor” would provide a bit of breathing room in the event of a relatively short federal shutdown.  If, however, a shutdown continues for longer than 2 weeks, it is likely that Medicare contractors would be forced to pay ambulance claims with dates of service on or after October 1, 2025 at the statutorily required amount (i.e., an amount that does not take into account the current add-ons).  If the spending deal to reopen the government includes the retroactive extension of those add-ons, the MACs would need to subsequently adjust any payments made at that lower amount.  There is precedent for such retroactive adjustments.  Of course, the current hope is that a deal can be reached early enough to avoid the need for any retroactive adjustments.

Thus, while Medicare payments for ambulance services will continue without interruption, the payment amounts will be impacted.  This is because the temporary add-ons for ground ambulance services (i.e., the 2% urban, 3% rural, and super-rural bonuses) are currently set to expire on September 30, 2025.  The hope is that any deal to avert a shutdown and/or to reopen the government after any potential shutdown will include an extension of these critical add-ons.

The American Ambulance Association is monitoring the situation closely, and will continue to keep our members updated as new information become available.

Sen. Schmitt PR | Senators Schmitt, Coons Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Reauthorize Construction of Memorial Honoring EMTs and Paramedics

Senators Schmitt, Coons Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Reauthorize Construction of Memorial Honoring EMTs and Paramedics

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Eric Schmitt (R-MO) and Chris Coons (D-DE) introduced a bipartisan bill to reauthorize the National Emergency Services Memorial Foundation to establish a national memorial in Washington, D.C. to honor EMS professionals for their service, dedication, and sacrifice.

“EMTs and paramedics in Missouri, and across the United States, work tirelessly during emergencies, often putting themselves in harm’s way to save lives. Thanks to this legislation, our emergency medical service providers will have a well-deserved national memorial that reminds the public of their commitment to service and honors those who have died in the line-of-duty,” said Senator Schmitt.

Continue Reading

Authority for Ground Ambulance Providers to Receive Funds from the Rural Health Transformation Program Authorized by Public Law 119-21

Advisory from Alston & Bird, Consultants to American Ambulance Association

On July 4, 2025, H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, was signed into law by the President.1 Section 71401 of the bill creates the Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP). This document describes the program and how ground ambulance providers could receive funds from RHTP. In general, there is no statutory prohibition or requirement regarding the types of entities that could receive any of the funds appropriated to a state under RHTP, so long as the funds are provided consistent with an approved state application. In other words, absent guidance or administrative requirements regarding the use of these funds, ground ambulance providers regardless of rural status, could be eligible to receive payments, which is likely aligned with the drafters’ intent.

I.                 Summary of RHTP

Funding for RHTP is authorized at $10 billion for each of fiscal years (FYs) 2026 to 2030.2 Half of the funds provided will be allotted equally among the 50 states with an approved application. The other half of the funds will be allotted by the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), who must ensure that no less than one fourth of the states with an approved application for a FY are allotted funds under this program, considering:

  • The percentage of the state population located in a rural census tract of a metropolitan statistical area (as determined by the most recent modification of the Goldsmith Modification).
  • The proportion of “rural health facilities” in the state relative to the number of “rural health facilities” nationwide.3
    • “Rural health facilities” are defined as: certain acute care hospitals that are paid under the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS); a critical access hospital; a sole community hospital; a Medicare-dependent, small rural hospital; a low-volume hospital; a rural emergency hospital; a rural health clinic; a federally qualified health center (FQHC); a community mental health center; a health center that is receiving a grant under section 330 of the Public Health Service Act; an opioid treatment program that is located in a rural census tract of a metropolitan statistical area; and a certified community behavioral health clinic that is located in a rural census tract of a metropolitan statistical area.
  • Note that this list does not specify which entities will be entitled to payments from this Rather, it is only used in calculating how some of the funds in this program are distributed.
  • Any other factors that the CMS Administrator deems

To receive RHTP funds, states must submit an application to the CMS Administrator during the applicable application period (as specified by the CMS Administrator but ends no later than December 31, 2025) that includes:4

  • A detailed rural health transformation plan to:
    • Improve access to hospitals, other health care providers, and health care items and services furnished to rural residents of the state;
    • Improve health care outcomes of rural residents of the state;
    • Prioritize the use of new and emerging technologies that emphasize prevention and chronic disease management;
    • Initiate, foster, and strengthen local and regional strategic partnerships between rural hospitals and other health care providers in order to promote measurable quality improvement, increase financial stability, maximize economies of scale and share best practices in care delivery;
    • Enhance economic opportunity for, and the supply of, health care clinicians through enhanced recruitment and training;
    • Prioritize data and technology driven solutions that help hospitals and other rural health care providers furnish high-quality health care services as close to a patient’s home as is possible;
    • Outline strategies to manage long-term financial solvency and operating models of rural hospitals in the state; and
    • Identify specific causes driving the accelerating rate of stand-alone rural hospitals becoming at risk of closure, conversion or service reduction;
  • A certification that none of the amounts provided by RHTP will be used by a state for intergovernmental transfer, certified public expenditure, or other expenditure to finance the non-federal share of expenditures required under any provision of law (including under the state plan established under the Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) programs or under a waiver under those programs); and
  • Any other information that the CMS Administrator may

Funds allocated to states must be used for three or more of the following health-related activities:5

  • Promoting evidence-based, measurable interventions to improve prevention and chronic disease management.
  • Providing payments to health care providers for the provision of health care items or services (as specified by the CMS Administrator).
    • A health care provider is defined as a provider of services or supplier who is enrolled under Titles XXI (authorizing CHIP), XVIII (authorizing the Medicare Program), or XIX (authorizing the Medicaid program) of the Social Security Act (SSA).
  • Promoting consumer-facing, technology-driven solutions for the prevention and management of chronic diseases.
  • Providing training and technical assistance for the development and adoption of technology-enabled solutions that improve care delivery in rural hospitals, including remote monitoring, robotics, artificial intelligence, and other advanced
  • Recruiting and retaining clinical workforce talent to rural areas, with commitments to serve rural communities for a minimum of five years.
  • Providing technical assistance, software, and hardware for significant information technology advances designed to improve efficiency, enhance cybersecurity capability development, and improve patient health outcomes.
  • Assisting rural communities to right size their health care delivery systems by identifying needed preventative, ambulatory, pre-hospital, emergency, acute inpatient care, outpatient care, and post-acute care service lines.
  • Supporting access to opioid use disorder treatment services (as defined in section 1861(jjj)(1) of the SSA), other substance use disorder treatment services, and mental health services.
  • Developing projects that support innovative models of care that include value-based care arrangements and alternative payment models, as appropriate.
  • Additional uses designed to promote sustainable access to high quality rural health care services, as determined by the CMS Administrator.

The bill directs the CMS Administrator to publish program instruction or other form of program guidance and appropriates $200 million to the CMS Administrator for FY 2025 to carry out this program.6

II.               Analysis

RHTP is structured to give states wide latitude in how they intend to use RHTP funds. Conversely, the bill gives CMS considerable discretion in how it distributes funds and which state applications to approve or deny. Under statute, there is nothing that explicitly excludes the use of RHTP funds to provide payments to any specific provider type or based on whether that provider is in a rural area. While CMS may issue guidance that relies on the definition of rural health facility as a way to limit eligible recipients, the program as statutorily constructed could be used to pay for tangentially healthcare-related projects and for providers and suppliers not defined as rural health facilities.

Accordingly, nothing in statute forbids states from applying for RHTP funds and including in their RHTP application a proposal to provide ground ambulance providers direct payments via the RHTP for the “provision of health care items and services.” Similarly, statute does not preclude a state using such funds for ground ambulance providers located in or servicing urban areas but the use of funds in this manner would have to be consistent with the state’s application and be in some way aligned with the permitted uses of funds. The only clear statutory limitation is that ground ambulance providers who receive RHTP funds must be enrolled in either Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP.

 

While statute is broad, the discretion afforded to CMS presents some potential challenges on the use of funds. For example, CMS must approve the state application and would monitor annually to ensure funds are used appropriately. If a state does not reference using funds to support ground ambulance providers consistent with the requirements of the program and the state uses the funds in that manner, CMS could terminate the state’s participation in the program. Additionally, statute provides discretion to CMS to determine what is included as the “provision of health care items and services.” It is possible that this definition will be construed narrowly such as to reflect health care items and services provided to residents in rural areas but more guidance from CMS is needed.

 

1 P.L. 119-21, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1/text.

2 42 USC 1397ee(h)(1)-(3).

3 42 USC 1397ee(h)(3)(D).

4 42 USC 1397ee(h)(2).

5 42 USC 1397ee(h)(5)-(6).

6 P.L. 119-21, Sec. 71401(c)-(d).

Budget Reconciliation Update- Health & Small Business Provisions

On June 16 the Senate Committee on Finance released legislative text within the committee’s jurisdiction for inclusion in the Senate Republican’s budget reconciliation bill. The following summaries include updates on provisions related to health care and small businesses.

The following memo prepared by AAA advocacy firm Alston & Bird provides an update on the key health care provisions included in the  One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1) following the legislative text released by the Senate Committee on Finance on June 16.

AB Summary_ House and Senate Reconciliation Bill Health Provisions (AAA)

 

The following memo prepared by AAA advocacy firm Capitol Counsel provides an overview of the small business related provisions included in the House passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), and the Senate Finance Committee Reconciliation Text.

House and SFC Small Business Provisions 6.17.25

AAA Letter to CMS- Reducing Regulatory Burdens on Ground Ambulance Providers

On June 9, the AAA submitted to CMS a letter on ways the Administration can reduce regulatory burdens on ground ambulance service organizations. The AAA requested that CMS eliminate the requirement to obtain a Physician Certification Statement (PCS), remove the vehicle section from the 855 form and eliminate the patient signature requirement. The letter was in response to a request for information (RFI) issued by CMS.

AAA RFI Response to CMS June 2025

Stay In Touch!

By signing up, you agree to the AAA Privacy Policy & Terms of Use